Category Archives: marketing

leveraging MLK day

target_oprah_static_184x901Very rarely do big brands get it right when inserting themselves into historic moments in time.  The SuperBowl ads have become an event within an event but we’re ok with that because the entire event is about pure unadulterated exploitation for entertainment.    The  Olympics have sold their soul and we’ve come to accept it.   Brands who pay the global big bucks are simply spending our money to be able to get our money.   We all know its part of the game.

But it takes the right kind of brand to  dare touch a nation that is in a delicate stage of heightened optimism – driven mostly from an eight year period of feeling duped – and actually do it with class and inspiration.  By building on its authentic efforts already commited to the communities it serves, Target has managed to do just that on  MLK day.    By tying into the historic inauguration of our first black President, his proclamation towards a day of community service, and by leveraging Oprah’s star-studded homage to this two day time, Target has brilliantly connected to their audience and promoted the message of community service that lives within what this day is all about.  To say that their vision is altruistic would be foolish.  But if all brands could use their name to drive home messages of helping others – just imagine.  “I have a dream”

evolving “green”

Landor – a leading brand strategy firm – published their 2009 trends forecast last week and I was very excited to see this language as they commented on the softening of the “green” trend: “Brands will need to integrate their commitment to sustainability into a larger message of efficiency, effectiveness, and value.”   I was excited because it means that perhaps we’re  starting to actually use the rationale  behind why these products and services should be green and get beyond the moniker of “green” itself (which just feels totally stagnating and short-lived, if not totally off-putting to the greater society as an outcome of the hippy movement).

Landor notes that the intensity of this trend is softening.  I think they’re right and wrong.   Symptomatic marketing relative to eco and green might be less appetizing given the concerns of the world right now (in other words adios B*S*#), but consumer motivations are actually becoming even more grounded and inclined to respond to products and services that are community minded, built simply and incorporate honest claims.  This isn’t exclusively green or sustainable but can be traced to the same roots.  In fact, smart marketers should look to the motivators behind the interest in “green” (and social responsibility and philanthro-capitalism and CSR and cause marketing) and work to connect with consumers leveraging any trace of these values found within their own brands – not simply give the prescribed nod to “green” and “sustainable” but be a little more clever in connecting with what underlies these trends.

best storytelling in a 2 minute video.

If only there were an Oscars category to represent the communication efforts of social change.    This video might win hands-down this year.  Not only is it simple and engaging but the audience will not forget The Girl Effect‘s logo.   The high impact of this video is the culmination of extraordinary design, fantastic editing, a beautiful score  and a well-crafted screenplay.  And all underscore the impact of the project’s identity.  I guarantee you will remember it.   Now, as with all things amazing, there are tons of others who have deconstructed the bejeezus out of it.  Two of my favorites were Made to Stick’s and Nathaniel Whittemore’s, though I love that google.org’s blog picked it up too.  I look forward to more amazing work by ad agencies “for benefit”.

beyond BetterWorld bingo

A term was coined in the early 90’s to describe the practice of using predictable trendy references to common business practices.  Called “buzzword bingo” the game was a reaction to the low value the individual words carry when generously used in speeches.  A similar thing is happening now.  A second cousin to “green washing”, businesses “in the business of doing good” are setting up shop left and right with names such as Global Giving, Give Something Back, Global Exchange, World of Good, BetterWorld Telecom, BetterWorld Books, One World Health, etc.  Are these businesses sacrificial lambs to the movement?  Socially responsible consumerism is in its very early stages of popularity.  Brands like Kiva and (RED) are still largely (despite some heavy weight marketing efforts) unknown and yet consumers seem to be open, even searching for opportunities to do more with their money.     To capitalize on this interest and to create “points of difference” within familiar categories, companies are using mindsets as icons to navigate the waters.  In a largely new frontier this works for the time being.  At least until that time we socially conscience people are working for – when the Nikes and Gaps of the world catch up to deliver a badge-worthy experience that’s as socially responsible as the next smaller company.    This is not to say that bgreen (apparel), greenerprinter, Earthlust or Eco Home Improvement are bad names, have bad products or are in any way less valuable to this movement of more responsible living.  But by choosing a common mindset for “differentiation”, they need to work harder to back it up with a unique brand experience.  One that feels compelling and which gives an opportunity to build a relationship on.    Patagonia and Timberland each carry a unique brand cache despite similar views on products created with earth-friendly practices in mind.   They have each created a different essence, an experience that delivers through the product.  This is how they built and kept a loyal audience within the apparel and shoe category.   Global Giving and World of Good are in their teen years relative to these mature brands, however it is in these years that they need to carefully develop and leverage their assets to create a brand that has a life beyond what is very certainly the better-business-buzzwords of today.

carbon consumerism

Innovation is born of necessity.  And strangely the carbon cap and trade system just might fit into that category.  History has proven that we need crisis to catalyze change.  And then it requires everyone, and I mean everyone, to understand and participate in the solution.  So while the cap and trade system is targeted at businesses, consumers will play a huge reinforcement role.  Enter ideas like the Carbon Quotient Project.  The CQ is an extension of similar concepts launched in Thailand and Japan that essentially strive to create a standard unit for product labels.  Much like the nutritional fact labels that adhere to all packaged food products, the CQ could give us GHG’s emitted, reduced or otherwise advise on a stand unit of measure for the carbon footprint of each product.  We, the consumer, then have the ability to offset our bag of potato chips or bottle of beer by riding our bike to work or simply not purchasing.  There are actually a million different behaviors that this could launch but the bottom line is that we would start to become educated relative to a standard unit (so the theory goes), hold businesses accountable and gradually start to bring about global responsibility and accountability for how businesses are impacting the deteriorating environment around us.   It has been said before but change is incremental.

short-termism

and the need for sustainable capitalism.  what Al and David said.   amen.

lessons for brands of change

Marketers have been watching the emergence of the Obama brand since nearly its inception. At that time, I don’t think anyone even dreamed of the impact this carefully crafted icon would create.  Quite literally, this brand power got us to this, our 44th President-elect.

While not every brand driving messages of social change will have the benefit of rising to such fame in two years compliments of $65 million in funding and daily prime news coverage, Obama’s campaign does clearly exemplify the fundamentals of building a strong brand.

1. Be different – stand out, stand for what you believe in.

2. Be authentic – never waiver from your purpose.

3. Be optimistic – people want to love something that makes them feel good.

4. Be consistent – and do it with passion.

5. Be individualistic – speak to your consumers 1:1.  Every relationship matters.

For more on Obama’s Lessons for Marketing from Henry Lambert on PSFK.com.

brands as salesmen

The reason I’m even in this business is to use all the fascinating principals of sociology, psychology, political science and economic market influences to help people figure out how to get what they need.  In the evil world of marketing, that seems equivalent to greed on behalf of the corporate behemoths.  Do you really need a new pair of jeans? (well, I do but that’s besides the point)  What I have long believed in however, is that these same corporate behemoths – also considered powerhouse brands – could use their trusted relationships with their customers to hold sway and influence by creating a broader awareness for the world around them.   Due to both the fortunate (lotsa revenue) and unfortunate outcomes (the many global crisis including loss of lotsa revenue) created by the 90’s and millenium boom, a few individuals and brands have  emerged to start leading this charge.  This blog will highlight their game changing efforts and their role as salesmen for the benefits of a better world.